Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:21

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Common herbal supplement linked to deadly liver disease - Times of India
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Wall Street floods into Bitcoin Futures as CME trader count hits all-time high - AMBCrypto
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Popular Processed Foods Linked to Early Signs of Parkinson’s Disease - SciTechDaily
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
What is a promotion strategy in marketing?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
New propulsion systems could enable a mission to Sedna - Phys.org